I spend too much of my life on planes, in the air and hanging around at airports. I also know more than is healthy about airline lounges, cabin upgrades and new routes - not through choice it just lands on my lap.
Recently whilst abroad I asked my travel agent to see about changing flights back from HK to LHR (see airport codes!) and one offer was with Air New Zealand. Now they are a good airline but I thought that they only flew to the UK the other way round over the Pacific then stopover in LAX. But no here was flight to London via HK. Strange I thought. Bit of investigation shows that ANZ have switched their Boeing 747 fleet to flying this route and downgraded the LAX route to Boeing 777s.
Why? Because people don't want the hassle and inconvenience of transting in the US. If you stop over you have to have the Biometric passport, your fingerprint and retina scanned. Not to mention the complete inability of US airports to deal with security arrangements without overdramatising the whole procedure. Stopping over in HK involves about a 15-20 min wait for your bags, a 5 min queue at Immigration - job done. The Kiwis are sensible people and are voting with their feet, nice to see their Airline taking heed.
Personally I'd never transit or visit the US unless I really had to for similar reasons. Even travelling through Heathrow is more a pain in the arse these days - which is saying something in itself.
And I'm not the only one of that opinion. In August, following the introduction of the draconian cabin baggage regulations, transit passengers using LHR dropped between 3%-5%. Reasons cited included the hassle, the extra security, reduction in carry on baggage when compared to other Euro Hubs like Schipol and Frankfurt. Over a year this reduction in passengers would cost UK based airlines 10-100millions of pounds, not to mention the loss of earning to BAA and the wider economy through transit facilities. Seems like we're finally back to a level footing with the rest of Europe on cabin baggage and liquids - though the idea of queuing up to security then taking off your belt, your shoes, pulling out your laptop and then ensuring your carry-on liquids are in a sealed clear plastic bag is hardly appealing. Perhaps I could balance a ball on my nose whilst reciting key passages from the bible, blindfold.
As ever these "security" measures are there to be seen rather than for their effectiveness. They achieve very little apart from inconvenience and as ever in this world the further to the front of the plane you fly the less hassle you encounter and the quicker it is dealt with. If such security is required why drop it now. Not the economic imperitave again, is it. All this at a time when the US airlines in Chapter 11 protection are making profits again - see United Airlines.
Anyway time to go......
